Fact-based scientifically-accurate educational information about Badgers
Home Shop Animals Pictures Help Seeing Groups Education News Search Books
Teaching Age 3-7 Age 8-11 Age 12-16 Age 17+ Poems Stories Politics Research Journals

Differences in trappability of badgers

Badgerland online shop

Badger by Tim Roper Collins New Naturalist Library (114) - Badger
This reference work is packed with detail about the badger - great for studious readers - there is no better book in print.  Click here to buy:
Paperback edition or Hardback edition
Kindle edition



Journal of Applied Ecology, Volume 36,Number 6, December 1999, pp. 1051-1062(12) - Blackwell Publishing


Tuyttens F.A.M.1; Macdonald D.W.1; Delahay R.2; Rogers L.M.2; Mallinson P.J.2; Donnelly C.A.3; Newman C.1

1: Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK;

2: Central Science Laboratory, Sand Hutton, York YO4 1LZ, UK; and

3: Wellcome Trust Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK


  1. Many ecological studies on the European badger, as well as certain programmes to control bovine tuberculosis, would benefit from a greater understanding of the factors that influence the probability of capturing this animal in cage-traps. We therefore investigated some of the factors that could explain differences in trappability between three badger populations in England: the high-density protected populations of Wytham Woods and Woodchester Park, and the low-density culled population of North Nibley.

  2. Trappability (the percentage of all individuals known alive that were actually captured) did not differ between sexes or adult age classes, but significant differences were found between cubs and adults, study areas, seasons and years, and various interactions between these variables.

  3. Circumstantial evidence suggests that the culling of badgers in North Nibley may have resulted in a decrease of adult trappability in the following year.

  4. Adult badgers at Wytham Woods and Woodchester Park were significantly more likely to be trapped zero times (‘trap-shy’) or all three times (‘trap-happy’) in 1996 than predicted by the estimated capture probabilities under the assumption of equal trappability.

  5. Wytham Woods differed from the other study areas in that trappability of its badgers was positively related to their body weight and its adult badgers were more likely to be trapped than cubs. These differences could be a consequence of differences in trapping procedures that were followed at Wytham (no prebaiting and fewer traps per badger).

  6. Trappability of badgers was not associated with social group size. Although it is difficult to determine precisely the movement and tuberculosis status of badgers based on mark–recapture data, our analyses did not suggest that either variable affected the likelihood of being trapped.

  7. Studies that compare demographic, biometric and epidemiological parameters based on data collected from badgers captured at different times or places ought to account for the observed differences in trappability.


cage-trapping; capture–mark–recapture; capture probability; Mycobacterium bovis; population estimation

Web site