www.badgerland.co.uk
Fact-based scientifically-accurate educational information about Badgers
Home Shop Animals Pictures Help Seeing Groups Education News Search Books
Teaching Age 3-7 Age 8-11 Age 12-16 Age 17+ Poems Stories Politics Research Journals
 

Model of btb: cattle and live test

Badgerland online shop

Badger by Tim Roper Collins New Naturalist Library (114) - Badger
This reference work is packed with detail about the badger - great for studious readers - there is no better book in print.  Click here to buy:
Paperback edition or Hardback edition
Kindle edition

 

Journal

Journal of Applied Ecology, Volume 38,Number 3, June 2001, pp. 520-535(16)

Authors

Smith G.C.;Cheeseman C.L.;Wilkinson D.;Clifton-Hadley R.S.

Abstract

  1. An individual-based stochastic simulation model was used to investigate the control of btb in the badger by using a live test to determine the presence of infection. The model was an extension of earlier models, and nearly all population and epidemiological parameters were derived from one study site.

  2. This is the first TB model to examine sex differences in disease epidemiology, and the transmission of TB from badgers to cattle. The latter is an essential step if reactive badger control strategies are to be modelled.

  3. Heterogeneity was introduced to the simulation model by the use of a carrying capacity, which defined the maximum number of breeding females per social group.

  4. The prevalence of TB, and the number of simulated cattle herd breakdowns, was reduced for all control strategies using a live test, namely localised culling, ring culling and proactive culling. However, only proactive culling resulted in a marked reduction in these values within a few years.

  5. If trapping efficacy was increased above its current value (80%), this did not improve the effectiveness of these culling strategies.

  6. If the number of individual badgers caught and tested per social group was doubled from two to four animals per group, then the overall level of effectiveness of these strategies could be doubled.

  7. The effectiveness could be improved if the sensitivity of the live test was increased, but did not continue to show an improvement above a sensitivity of about 70%.

  8. Given the constraints of the current live test sensitivity (41%) and a trapping efficacy of 80%, proactive culling, following the testing of four individuals per group, led to an average of three cattle herd breakdowns per year in the simulation, compared with an average of 31 per year when simulating the live test trial as used between 1994 and 1996.

Keywords

control; individual-based model; TB; wildlife disease

Web site